Martin Partington: Spotlight on the Justice System

Keeping the English Legal System under review

Archive for February 2012

Reforming the Civil Justice system

with one comment

The Government has recently announced plans to change the ways in which the civil justice system works. These are the outcome of the Consultation exercise launched in 2011. The principal changes are:

1. Expanding mediation by building on the mediation service for those who have small claims. This service has received very high levels of customer satisfaction, and has been used to resolve almost 15,000 disputes over the past two years. And, since it is primarily a telephone-based service, that means up to 30,000 parties that have been able to resolve their disputes without ever having to travel to court. With the introduction of automatic referral to the small claims mediation service, the Government wants to see this service expand to offer mediation to all 80,000 disputes that are currently allocated to the small claims track (i.e. those under £5,000).

2. Expanding the small claims track, initially to £10,000. Many of the cases that fell into the small claims track back in 1999,  when Lord Woolf’s reforms were introduced, are now routinely treated as fast track cases with associated costs. The Government may consider a further increase to £15,000 in due course. The current lower limits for housing and personal injury cases will be unchanged. In addition, judges will have power to transfer suitable business to business cases with a dispute value over £10,000 to the small claims track without requiring the consent of the parties. The judiciary will also have the option of referring more complex cases with a case value below £10,000 to the fast track if that is  considered appropriate.

3 Introducing a fixed-cost simplified claims procedure for more types of personal injury claims, similar to that which was introduced in 2010 for road traffic accidents under £10,000.

4. Going ahead, as soon as is feasible with proposals for streamlining enforcement processes, implementing some of the Courts, Tribunals and Enforcement Act provisions and to introduce a minimum threshold for Orders for Sale.

5. Making  structural reforms  This will include  introducing a single county court jurisdiction for England and Wales, which will facilitate greater flexibility in the use of courts around the country and enable more proceedings to be issues from centralised processing centres. A number of specialist areas of work will be removed from the county court and transferred to the High Court. The Government will increase the financial limit below which equity claims may be commenced in the county courts from £30,000 to £350,000. And the financial limit below which non-PI claims may not be commenced in the High Court will be increased from £25,000 to £100,000.

Many of the more potentially interesting changes floated in the original consultation paper, e.g. greater use of telephone hearings, more cases determined on the papers alone, have been left on the back-burner at least for the time being.

The Response paper does not set out a timetable for the implementation of these changes; but since none of them seems to require legislation, it is presumed that they will come about by administrative decision in the coming months.

It is notable that, with the honourable exception of the Guardian, none of these important reforms appear to have been thought worth a mention in the mass news media; but these are exactly the sort of changes that are relevant to the wider public, not just to lawyers.

The press release is at

The full response is at


Written by lwtmp

February 12, 2012 at 9:54 am

Posted in Chapter 8

Reforms to the Family Justice system

leave a comment »

The Government has published its response to the Norgrove report on reforms needed to the Family Justice system.
The response is, broadly, to accept Norgrove’s recommendations. The Press release states that the main focus will be on the following matters:

1. Speeding up care and adoption cases by reforming the public law system and increasing transparency. The Government has already begun to publish data on. It will introduce legislation at the earliest opportunity to enable a six month time limit to be set and wherever possible it expects cases to be completed more quickly, while retaining the flexibility to extend complex cases where this is genuinely in the children’s interest.

2. Simplifying the family justice system to help separating couples reach lasting agreement speedily, if possible without going to court. The Government will make it mandatory for separating parents who propose court action to resolve a dispute about their child to have an initial assessment to see if mediation is something which would be suitable instead, to help them agree on the arrangements for their child. The Government estimates that it will spend an extra £10m a year on legal aid for family mediation taking the total to £25m per year (although it has placed no upper limit on this figure). It will also examine how to give the courts more robust enforcement tools to combat failure to comply with judgments.

3. A  new family justice board will be established to drive culture change and better cross-system.It will be accountable to ministers, made up of senior figures representing the key organisations who play a role within the system and who will have a clear remit to improve performance.

On the most contentious issue, whether there should be a statutory presumption in favour of shared parenting, the Government appears to have accepted that this specific idea, advocated by a number of people, should not be pursued. However, the Government has decided that it should not leave the current law as it is. Its response, again as reported in the press release is:

  • The changes in education and the introduction of parenting agreements which the review recommended will help ensure better recognition of the joint role of parents within wider society.
  • The Government also accepts the need to clarify and restore public confidence that the courts recognise the joint nature of parenting. It will therefore make a legislative statement emphasising the importance of children having an ongoing relationship with both their parents after family separation, where that is safe, and in the child’s best interests. The government is mindful of the lessons which must be learnt from the Australian experience of legislating in this area, which were highlighted by the Review and led them to urge caution. The Government will therefore consider very carefully how legislation can be framed to ensure that a meaningful relationship is not about equal division of time, but the quality of parenting received by the child.

Given that the current role of the court is to ensure that the interests of thye child are paramount, it is not entirely clear what the ‘legislative statement’ will be able to achieve. However, no doubt further announcements will be made in due course.

The press release can be found at

The full government response can be seen at

Written by lwtmp

February 12, 2012 at 9:00 am

Posted in chapter 7

The future for lawyers? Interview with Professor Richard Susskind

leave a comment »

Richard Susskind has established a reputation for thinking the unthinkable about the legal profession. In this podcast I talk to Richard about how he thinks the legal profession will develop over the next few years. Of one thing he is certain; there will be enormous changes.

Those coming new to the study of law should not be put off by this but rather seize the new opportunities that will be created; but they should realise that current images of the legal profession will not be sustained.

Read more about Richard and his work at

Listen to Richard at

Written by lwtmp

February 6, 2012 at 2:20 pm

Posted in Chapter 9, Podcasts

Facts and figures

leave a comment »

What is happening in the legal services market? As we enter this period of major change, it may be helpful to have some base data against which future developments may be measured. I have been looking at the webpages of the Legal Education and Training Review.
With their permission I have extracted the following information (together with references to the sources):

  • The UK legal services sector employs nearly 350,000 people
  • Legal services contribute 1.8% of Britain’s GDP
  • Between 2000 and 2010 invisible exports by law firms have tripled in value to £2.9bn
  • In 2009/10 there were 117,862 solicitors and 15,270 barristers in practice, together with some 22,000 trainee and practising legal executives in England and Wales
  • In 2009/10 women made up 45.9% of solicitors with practising certificates (and about a fifth of the partners at the ‘top 100′ law firms)
  • In 2009/10 women constituted 34.4% of the Bar (including 11% of Queen’s Counsel)
  • 11.1% of solicitors and 10.1% of barristers in practice are from black and minority ethnic groups
  • In 2010 1.7% of firms employed 41.6% of solicitors in private practice
  • There were 4,874 new training contracts registered in 2009/10, a decrease of 16% on the previous year.
  • In the same year 11,370 full time and 3,140 part-time Legal Practice Course places were available.
  • 460 ‘First Six’ pupillages were registered in 2009/10, a decrease of 0.6%; 1,432 students had passed the Bar Professional Training Course in 2008/09
  • 13,433 students graduated with Qualifying Law Degrees in the summer of 2009
  • Over half (56.6%) of the QLD graduates in 2009 received first or upper second class degrees.
  • ILEX has 19,176 members
  • 73% of ILEX members are female
  • In 2009 there were 29,211 applicants to study for a first degree in law in England and Wales; slightly over two-thirds of these were accepted.


Office of National Statistics

Bar Barometer: Trends in the Profile of the Bar, (General Council of the Bar/Bar Standards Board, March 2011)

Institute of Legal Executives

Trends in the Solicitors’ Profession: Annual Statistical Report 2010, (The Law Society, 2010).

Those starting out on the study of law need to reflect on the implications of this information. In particular the gap between the numbers of training contracts and pupillages available and the numbers reaching the stage when they can qualify for a training contract/pupillage.

One of the reasons why I emphasise the ‘holistic’ approach to thinking about Law and the Legal System in my book is that students who want to use their studies in some practical context need to think beyond the traditional professional boundaries of solicitor and barrister.

For further information about the Legal Education and Training Review see

Written by lwtmp

February 6, 2012 at 2:04 pm

Posted in Chapter 9