Collection of responses to the Independent Review of Administrative Law (IRAL)
Given the importance of judicial review, it seems strange that the Independent Review of JR, chaired by Lord Faulks, decided it would not publish submissions it received to the Consultation it launched. This blog from the UK Institute for Administrative Justice very usefully provides a list of those submissions of which it is aware, with links to them.
Given the decision of the Independent Review of Administrative Law (IRAL) not to make publicly available responses received as part of its call for evidence, UKAJI has decided to bring together in one place IRAL responses which have been made public. Should you wish to include an IRAL responses on this page, please contact Lee Marsons on lm17598@essex.ac.uk.
- The Administrative Justice Council (AJC)published its response to the IRAL
- The Administrative Law Bar Association (ALBA)published its response to the IRAL.
- Matrix Chamberspublished its response to the IRAL.
- Paul Daly (University of Ottawa)published his response to the IRAL.
- Young Legal Aid Lawyerspublished its response to the IRAL.
- The Public Law Projectpublishedits submission to the Independent Review of Administrative Law.
- Oxford Human Rights Hubpublished its response to the IRAL.
- British Institute of Human Rightspublished its response to the IRAL
View original post 231 more words
[…] I noted the review of judicial review at https://martinpartington.com/2020/08/07/independent-review-of-administrative-law/. See also https://martinpartington.com/2020/11/04/collection-of-responses-to-the-independent-review-of-adminis… […]
Review of the Human Rights Act 1998 | Martin Partington: Spotlight on the Justice System
December 18, 2020 at 11:17 am